The Finnish secret to bulletproofing your organisation against 2026 AI disruption
Why a globally acclaimed media literacy framework provides the ultimate defence against deepfakes and algorithmic bias for leaders.
The prospect of significant AI disruption by 2026 necessitates a clear and strategic response from senior leaders. A recent discussion regarding the Finnish media literacy framework provided a compelling insight into how high-stakes sectors, such as finance and logistics, can better prepare for this shift. While technological change often triggers a reactive approach, the Finnish model offers a proactive, evidence-based strategy for building organisational resilience. It is useful to examine how these international insights can be adapted to the specific needs of corporate environments.
The primary goal of this newsletter is to help you transform your approach to AI. By looking at how Finland consistently ranks at the top of the European Media Literacy Index, we can find a blueprint for managing the AI disruptions predicted for 2026. This is about building resilience and ensuring our teams remain sharp, ethical, and discerning in an age of deepfakes and automated bias.
Core Concepts of AI Literacy
To navigate the future effectively, we must first understand the pillars of the Finnish success. Their strategy is built upon three core concepts that are directly transferable to the corporate world.
The first concept is the development of transversal competencies. These are skills that cut across different areas of expertise, such as critical thinking and the ability to recognise bias. In Finland, these skills are taught from a very early age. For leaders in the UK, this means moving beyond simple technical training and focusing on the cognitive habits of our staff.
The second concept involves the human-value surplus. As AI begins to handle more of our routine tasks, we must identify the specific areas where human empathy, context, and ethical judgement are irreplaceable. We must decide which decisions require a human touch to maintain our reputational integrity.
The third concept is probabilistic protocols. This involves moving away from blind trust in AI outputs. Instead, we must treat AI as a tool that provides suggestions based on probability, requiring human verification through structured confidence scores and escalation chains.
Detailed Elaboration: From Classroom to Boardroom
Finland’s success stems from a progressive approach that starts in early childhood. The Finnish National Curriculum notes that ‘media literacy aims to develop critical thinking, media analysis abilities, and ethical media behaviour’. This foundation has now been extended to include AI deepfake detection. In my book, Enhanced Leadership, I argue that ‘the strength of a leader is found in their capacity to prepare their team for any version of the future’. By adopting the Finnish ethos, we can treat our staff as the first line of defence against AI errors.
To implement this, you should consider regular AI system testing. You might schedule bi-monthly exercises where cross-functional teams probe AI reports for errors, mirroring the content analysis used in Finnish schools. To make this engaging, you could offer rewards for verified flaws that might affect company strategy. This creates a culture where finding a mistake is celebrated rather than feared.
Furthermore, we must deconstruct the objective functions of the large language models we use. Through prompt engineering tests, your teams can identify whether a model has a bias towards speed over accuracy. This is similar to the media deconstruction techniques led by KAVI, the Finnish National Audiovisual Institute.
In terms of productivity, we know that AI can handle roughly 70% of routine tasks. However, this leaves humans with the full load of verification. To manage this, we should redesign our metrics. I suggest tracking Critical Review Hours as a key performance indicator. If AI triples your output, you must mandate proportional verification time. Using human-in-the-loop pipelines ensures that while AI drafts the content, your teams validate it using checklists such as ‘Who benefits from this message?’.
Strategies for Leaders
For those of you in senior leadership roles, your focus should be on the structural and cultural shifts required to support these new competencies.
Audit and Reflection: Regularly ask your team: ‘If our AI prioritises cost over ethics by 10%, what reputational impact hits us in 18 months?’. This keeps ethical considerations at the forefront of technological adoption.
Sector Collaboration: Do not work in a vacuum. Partner with libraries or technology firms for joint workshops. This echoes the Finnish model of teamwork with non-governmental organisations to build a media-savvy population.
Normalise Glitches: Create a safe space for staff to report AI errors. Hosting bi-weekly forums where employees can share significant errors, such as a biased hiring algorithm, can provide invaluable insights for the whole company.
Strategies for Coaches
If you are a coach working with high-level executives, your role is to facilitate the transition from being a performance expert to becoming a cognitive ally.
Identify Blind Spots: Use exercises to help leaders name five AI blind spots in their leadership. This encourages a healthy level of scepticism and awareness.
Focus on Empathy: Help your clients identify the ‘human-value surplus’ in their decision-making. These are the moments that demand context and empathy that AI simply lacks.
Track Progress: Suggest using systems to track the annual AI literacy progress of their teams. An annual budget of £300 to £600 per person for upskilling is a wise investment in the current climate.
Conclusion and Call to Action
The Finnish model demonstrates that resilience is built through education, audit, and constant adaptation. By benchmarking your own literacy gaps against these high standards and investing in your teams annually, you can ensure your organisation is prepared for the synthetic threats of 2026.
I encourage you to take the first step today. Start by reviewing your current AI verification processes and consider how you can implement a ‘Bias Library’ to curate anonymised failure cases for onboarding.
Follow on LinkedIn - Spotify - YouTube - Apple
Level Up Leadership is a passion project in my spare time. I enjoy doing it, and I intend to keep these articles and podcasts free. However, the software and equipment I use isn’t free! So, if you are enjoying this content and would like to make a donation, you can do so by clicking this button. Thank you.